Two ADN Bills Propose Redirecting 0.5% Employer IESS Contribution to Secap — USD 100–120M Annually at Stake

Legislative Context

Two bills filed by Acción Democrática Nacional (ADN) legislators are attempting to restore dedicated funding for Secap (Servicio Ecuatoriano de Capacitación Profesional):

Date	Sponsor	Status
November 25, 2025	Manuel Blacio	Committee review
January 28, 2026	Nuvia Vega	Committee review

Both bills center on a 0.5% employer payroll contribution routed to Secap.

Mechanism

Under the Vega proposal, IESS (social security) would act as the withholding and remittance agent: "actuará como agente de retención y recaudación y transferirá mensualmente" — acting as collection agent with monthly transfers to Secap.

Historical Baseline

Secap lost its dedicated funding stream in 2015. Labor Minister Harold Burbano told media Secap has been operating "sin presupuesto" — without a budget — since losing "0,5% del aporte al IESS".

Historical Secap receipts from this contribution: USD 100 to 120 million annually.

Ambiguity Flagged

Labor economist Patricia Borja called the minister's framing "imprecisas" — imprecise — pointing to a critical ambiguity: is the 0.5% a redirect from existing IESS employer contributions (budget-neutral for employers, downstream-negative for IESS), or a new top-up contribution (new 0.5% payroll cost for employers)?

The answer determines:

• Net payroll cost for Ecuador's ~1 million formal-sector employers
• IESS funding trajectory, already strained given the USD 4.28B 2026 pension deficit previously reported
• Employer payroll projections for FY2026 and FY2027

What to Watch

• Committee text clarification. Watch for revised bill language that resolves the redirect-vs-new-contribution ambiguity. The current text admits both readings.
• IESS posture. Any redirect is likely to draw Comisión Técnica pushback given existing pension-system strain.
• Employer chamber response. Cámara de Industrias de Guayaquil and Cámara de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa posture will drive legislative traction.
• Secap operational readiness. Scaled Secap operations would require rapid hiring and capacity buildout — a separate operational question even if funding passes.
• Passage probability. ADN holds a legislative plurality but not an unchallenged majority; cross-bench negotiation is required.

Source: Primicias